morrist wrote:
A lot of the talk on here about all the SAFA's money demonstrates that there are a lot of people not really knowing what they are talking about.
If you look at just how much the SAFA actually has, it varies during the season from about £220,000 to £280,000 with the precise figure depending on when you look at it. For example, the annual fees come in around July/August so this will boost the amount and it will then fall back to lower figures when you start paying out rather than gather in.
But lets say for argument's sake that you had a reserve figure of £200,000. There are approximately 1500 clubs and every one of them has the same right to benefit from any handout as the other 1499. So you are talking in the region of £130 per club. Now I suppose every club would welcome a £130 windfall but its not going to be revolutionary and after you have dished it out the SAFA would be virtually bankrupt. In other words everyone has received a wee bit of very temporary help and emptied the coffers in the process.
If you decided to use the SAFA's bank balances to provide improved facilities, well I think The Mash has very effectively blasted that out of the water when he points out that the first 3G pitch stops at the half way line and we would need to wait maybe 10 years or more to build up enough funds to complete the other half. And, bearing in mind that the SAFA's money is "owned" by 1500 clubs from Gretna to the Shetlands, how do you imagine half a new park in maybe, Glasgow, Edinburgh or wherever benefits the guys in Annan and Kirkwall and Stornoway etc etc. I'm not saying you couldn't dream up a few ideas on using the SAFA "fortune" but its going to be very watery jam thinly spread!
Next lets look at the nonsense about all those "blazers" wallowing in the good life on SAFA Committees, not having a clue about the real world and:
According to Jay : "failing its members" Mind you its not surprising they have "failed" their members when as Muddyboots so diplomatically puts it they are "Like a retired, outdated, unwanted government cabinet which we can't vote out"
I've got news for you Muddyboots and anyone else who thinks the way you do : you can indeed vote "them" out. But I hope you have a wee army to replace us. Most of them, including me, are spending countless hours doing jobs that our younger friends won't touch with a barge pole. I'll even make you an offer just too good to refuse: drive down to Kilmarnock, pick up all the stuff taking up half a room here, cancel your social life for half the weekends in the year, get ready for inflated energy bills, sit on Committees dealing with eejits who can't even read the paperwork you send to them etc etc etc. Then go back home and sort out your referees for next weeks matches, send out the paperwork nobody reads then on Saturday sit in and hope you won't have to chase too many for results they forgot to phone in and then start all over again for the following week. And, Jay, there are dozens of us "failing our members" in exactly the same way. And before you remind me that I don't have to do it, which is true, ask yourself why we do it. Maybe we just like "failing our members"
Time some of you grew up, got off your arses and came back into the real world.
Most of that statement i can throw back at you but since you said it i will say this
the system of paperwork could be made obsolete as the way forward is online
all managers could do team sheets submit bookings ect ect if their was a format that allowed us to do so the thing you need to do is simplify everything